Diamond v. State
46 P.2d 918, 57 Okla. Crim. 219
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Diamond v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 57 Okla. Crim. 214 →
Opinion
This is a companion case to- No. A-8809, 57 Okla. Cr. 214, 46 Pac. (2d) 966, just decided, involving the same defendant and the same charge except for a different transaction. The same questions are raised, and plaintiff in error’s brief differing from that filed in A-8809 only in referring to page numbers of the record; the state’s brief setting, up no additional matter and referring to its former brief.
Under the rule there laid down, the case is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diamond v. State, 46 P.2d 918, 57 Okla. Crim. 219 (Okla. Ct. App. 1935).
46 P.2d 918 (Diamond v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Diamond v. State
46 P.2d 966 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1935)