Home/Supreme Court/Diamond v. Louisiana

Diamond v. Louisiana

376 U.S. 201, 84 S. Ct. 696, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1730
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 24, 1964
Docket100
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 376 U.S. 201 (Diamond v. Louisiana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diamond v. Louisiana, 376 U.S. 201, 84 S. Ct. 696, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1730 (1964).

Opinion

376 U.S. 201 (1964)

DIAMOND
v.
LOUISIANA.

No. 100.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued February 20, 1964.
Decided February 24, 1964.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA.

James M. Nabrit III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Jack Greenberg, Wiley A. Branton and Johnnie A. Jones.

Ralph L. Roy argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana.

PER CURIAM.

The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dale Huhmann v. Federal Express Corp.
874 F.3d 1102 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Commonwealth v. Millhouse
34 Pa. D. & C.2d 693 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
376 U.S. 201, 84 S. Ct. 696, 11 L. Ed. 2d 650, 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-louisiana-scotus-1964.