Diamond v. Hose O Weaver and Son
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
COREY L. DIAMOND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) CA 19-918-CG-MU ) HOSE O WEAVER AND SON, ) ) Defendant. )
JUDGMENT
In accordance with the order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, prior to service of process, because Diamond has failed to allege in his complaint that he exhausted his administrative remedies before the EEOC as to the Defendant’s alleged discrimination. See Burnett v. City of Jacksonville, Florida, 376 Fed.Appx. 905, 906-907 (11th Cir. Apr. 27, 2010) (upholding a district court’s dismissal without prejudice of a litigant’s civil action alleging gender discrimination and retaliation pursuant to Title VII for failure to allege exhaustion of administrative remedies where the district court afforded litigant the opportunity to re-file to cure any defects). DONE and ORDERED this 16th day of December, 2019. /s/ Callie V. S. Granade SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Diamond v. Hose O Weaver and Son (Diamond v. Hose O Weaver and Son) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.