Diamond v. Diamond
This text of 94 A.2d 569 (Diamond v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion bx
On preliminary objections the court below dismissed the plaintiff’s bill in equity and she appeals.
At the instance of the wife the bill, in plain language, seeks to enjoin her husband, Leonard Diamond, from committing adultery with Gussie Stein, and also to restrain Dorothy Lerner, who is alleged to have been an aider and abettor of the principal defendant’s acts.
While it may be convenient to restrain the errant spouse, nevertheless it is without authority under the law of Pennsylvania.
In the first place, equity will not enjoin the commission of a crime: Commonwealth v. Smith, 266 Pa. 511, 109 A. 786, 9 A.L.E. 922. In the second place, courts of equity in Pennsylvania are concerned only where property rights are involved. See Heasley v. Operative Plasterers & Cement Finishers International Association, Local No. 31, 324 Pa. 257, 188 A. 206; Kenneck v. Pennock, 305 Pa. 288, 157 A. 613; Ashinsky v. Levenson, 256 Pa. 14, 100 A. 491.
The order of the court below sustaining preliminary objections and dismissing the bill, is affirmed; appellant to pay the costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
94 A.2d 569, 372 Pa. 562, 1953 Pa. LEXIS 544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diamond-v-diamond-pa-1953.