Diaby v. Holder

442 F. App'x 26
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2011
DocketNo. 10-2325
StatusPublished

This text of 442 F. App'x 26 (Diaby v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Diaby v. Holder, 442 F. App'x 26 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sekou Diaby, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his third motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Diaby’s motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diaby, (B.I.A. Oct. 28, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
442 F. App'x 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaby-v-holder-ca4-2011.