Diaby v. Holder
This text of Diaby v. Holder (Diaby v. Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1609
SEKOU DIABY,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 08-2158
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: August 11, 2009 Decided: August 31, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petitions denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, P.C., Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Gregory G. Katsas, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher C. Fuller, Senior Litigation Counsel, Zoe J. Heller, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Sekou Diaby, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions
for review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board)
denying his motions to reopen and reconsider. We have reviewed
the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the
denial of relief on Diaby’s motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a),
(b), (c) (2009). We accordingly deny the petitions for review
for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diaby (B.I.A.
Apr. 23 & Sept. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Diaby v. Holder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/diaby-v-holder-ca4-2009.