Diaby v. Holder

332 F. App'x 904
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 31, 2009·No. Nos. 08-1609, 08-2158·Published

Opinion

[905]*905Petitions denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Sekou Diaby, a native and citizen of Guinea, petitions for review of orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motions to reopen and reconsider. We have reviewed the administrative record and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on Diaby’s motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (b), (c) (2009). We accordingly deny the petitions for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Diaby (B.I.A. Apr. 23 & Sept. 26, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Diaby v. Holder, 332 F. App'x 904 (4th Cir. 2009).

332 F. App'x 904 (Diaby v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related