Dexter v. Hazen
10 Johns. 246
Opinion
The evidence of the former trial and judgment was properly rejected, as it had not been pleaded, nor notice given 0f at the time of joining issue. But the promise declared on was without consideration. It was a mere license gratuitously given, revocable at pleasure, it being still executory. (8 East, 308.) The judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dexter v. Hazen, 10 Johns. 246 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).
10 Johns. 246 (Dexter v. Hazen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
The People v. . the Canal Appraisers
33 N.Y. 461 (New York Court of Appeals, 1865)
Rhodes v. Otis
33 Ala. 578 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1859)
Boyce v. Brown
7 Barb. 80 (New York Supreme Court, 1849)
Young v. Rummell
2 Hill & Den. 478 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
Brown v. Dysinger
1 Rawle 408 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1829)
Coles v. Carter
6 Cow. 691 (New York Supreme Court, 1827)