Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co. v. Hearst
This text of 205 A.D. 863 (Dexter Sulphite Pulp & Paper Co. v. Hearst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the unusual and peculiar circumstances disclosed by the record in this ease, we think that this court should exercise the jurisdiction which it undoubtedly possesses to entertain the motion to vacate the temporary injunction granted herein. (Matter of Barkley, 42 App. Div. 597; Matter of Mitchel v. Cropsey, 177 id. 663.) The temporary injunction was improperly granted (Rules of Civil Practice, rule 155), and the samé is vacated, without prejudice to the motions now pending. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
205 A.D. 863, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dexter-sulphite-pulp-paper-co-v-hearst-nyappdiv-1923.