Dewey Frankum v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare

343 F.2d 426, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 1965·No. 9768·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Social Security disability insurance ■benefits were sought by Dewey C. Fra-n-kum but denied by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare. The Secretary found that the claimant had not established that he was “ineapable of performing his prior, usual or regular work” and consequently that he had failed to prove that he was incapable of “engaging in any substantial gainful activity”, a prerequisite for success under the Act. §§ 223(c) (2) and 216(i), 42 U.S.C. §§ 423(c) (2) and 416 (i).

*427 Upon consideration of the record and the arguments of counsel, orally and on brief, we cannot say that the District Court was clearly erroneous, within the intendment of Rule 52(a) Fed.R.Civ.P., in concluding that the Secretary was not without substantial evidence to support his decision. § 205(g), 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dewey Frankum v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 343 F.2d 426, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6140 (4th Cir. 1965).

343 F.2d 426 (Dewey Frankum v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Besseck v. Finch
342 F. Supp. 957 (W.D. Virginia, 1972)
Patton v. Finch
305 F. Supp. 810 (W.D. North Carolina, 1969)
Ingles v. Finch
303 F. Supp. 94 (W.D. Virginia, 1969)
Dye v. Finch
299 F. Supp. 481 (W.D. Virginia, 1969)
Kern v. Cohen
296 F. Supp. 37 (W.D. Virginia, 1969)
Stewart v. Gardner
270 F. Supp. 92 (S.D. West Virginia, 1966)
Miller v. Celebrezze
252 F. Supp. 598 (E.D. North Carolina, 1966)