DeWeese v. Precythe

District Court, E.D. Missouri·Decided July 18, 2023·No. 4:23-cv-00885·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

CHRIS DEWEESE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23-CV-885-RLW ) ANNE L. PRECYTHE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff Chris DeWeese’s prisoner civil rights complaint. For the reasons discussed below, the Court will order plaintiff to file a signed, amended complaint on a Court-provided form. He will also be directed to file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or to pay the full filing fee. Background On July 10, 2023, fourteen inmates incarcerated at the Missouri Eastern Correctional Center (“MECC”), including plaintiff, filed a “class action” lawsuit. (Docket No. 1). The 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint named six defendants affiliated with MECC. The defendants were accused of allowing the plaintiff-inmates to be restrained with plastic zip ties for an excessive amount of time while the Correctional Emergency Response Team searched their housing unit. Only one of the plaintiff-inmates, David Wilson, signed the complaint, filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and submitted a copy of his inmate account statement. Because the Court does not allow multiple prisoners to join together in a single lawsuit under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20, the complaint was severed and new cases opened for each individual plaintiff. (Docket No. 2). The instant case is one of the newly created cases brought by a plaintiff severed from the initial action. Discussion The complaint in this action is defective for two reasons. First, plaintiff has not signed the

complaint. Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires an unrepresented party to personally sign all of his pleadings, motions, and other papers, and requires courts to “strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the … party’s attention.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). The Local Rules of this Court also require that all filings by a self-represented party be signed. E.D. Mo. L.R. 2.01(A)(1). Second, the complaint alleges violations of the rights of a group of inmates as a whole, rather than describing the specific constitutional violations allegedly endured by the individual plaintiff. While federal law authorizes plaintiff to plead his own case personally, he lacks standing to bring claims on behalf of others. See Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975) (in general, to satisfy the standing requirement, a plaintiff “must assert his own legal rights and interests, and

cannot rest his claim to relief on the legal rights or interests of third parties”). Further, a self- represented litigant who is not an attorney may not represent someone else in federal court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1654. See also Jones ex rel. Jones v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., 401 F.3d 950, 952 (8th Cir. 2005) (“a non-attorney … may not engage in the practice of law on behalf of others”); Iannaccone v. Law, 142 F.3d 553, 558 (2nd Cir. 1998) (stating that “because pro se means to appear for one’s self, a person may not appear on another’s behalf in the other’s cause … A person must be litigating an interest personal to him”); and Lewis v. Lenc–Smith Mfg. Co., 784 F.2d 829, 830 (7th Cir. 1986) (a person who is not licensed to practice law may not represent another individual in federal court). Because plaintiff is proceeding as a self-represented litigant, the Court will give him the opportunity to file a signed, amended complaint to set forth his own claims for relief. In completing his amended complaint, plaintiff should follow the instructions set forth below. Amendment Instructions

Plaintiff should type or neatly print his amended complaint on the Court’s civil rights form, which will be provided to him. See E.D. Mo. L.R. 2.06(A) (“All actions brought by self- represented plaintiffs or petitioners should be filed on Court-provided forms”). If the amended complaint is handwritten, the writing must be legible. In the “Caption” section of the Court-provided form, plaintiff should clearly name each and every party he is intending to sue. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (“The title of the complaint must name all the parties”). If there is not enough room in the caption, plaintiff may add additional sheets of paper. However, all the defendants must be clearly listed. Plaintiff should put his case number in the appropriate location on the upper right-hand section of the first page. He should then fill out the complaint form in its entirety, and must sign

it. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). In the “Statement of Claim” section, plaintiff should provide a short and plain statement of the factual allegations supporting his claim. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). Plaintiff should put each claim into a numbered paragraph, and each paragraph should be “limited as far as practicable to a single set of circumstances.” See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(b). The amended complaint should only include claims that arise out of the same transaction or occurrence. In other words, plaintiff should only include claims that are related to each other. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). Alternatively, plaintiff may choose a single defendant and set forth as many claims as he has against that defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 18(a). Furthermore, as noted above, plaintiff should only bring claims on his own behalf, and not on behalf of anyone else. That is, his claim should describe what happened to him, and not what happened to others. In structuring his amended complaint, plaintiff should begin by writing the defendant’s name. In separate, numbered paragraphs under that name, plaintiff should write a short and plain

statement of the factual allegations supporting his claim against that specific defendant. If plaintiff is suing more than one defendant, he should follow the same procedure for each defendant. Plaintiff must specify whether he intends to sue each defendant in an official capacity, an individual capacity, or both. The failure to sue a defendant in his or her individual capacity may result in the dismissal of that defendant. If plaintiff is suing a defendant in an individual capacity, he is required to allege facts demonstrating the personal responsibility of the defendant for harming him. See Madewell v. Roberts, 909 F.2d 1203, 1208 (8th Cir. 1990) (stating that 42 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DeWeese v. Precythe, (E.D. Mo. 2023).

DeWeese v. Precythe (DeWeese v. Precythe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Warth v. Seldin
422 U.S. 490 (Supreme Court, 1975)
Samvel Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
760 F.3d 843 (Eighth Circuit, 2014)
Mark Neubauer v. FedEx Corporation
849 F.3d 400 (Eighth Circuit, 2017)
Madewell v. Roberts
909 F.2d 1203 (Eighth Circuit, 1990)