Devine v. Byrd
667 F. Supp. 414, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17932
Opinion
OPINION
“A judge should not talk too much.”1 Therefore2 ...
This pro se § 1983 suit seeks “good time credit.”
But the plaintiff is now dead.3
That means this suit is, too.
The first is with prejudice.4
The second, without.
Dismissed.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Devine v. Byrd, 667 F. Supp. 414, 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17932 (N.D. Tex. 1982).
667 F. Supp. 414 (Devine v. Byrd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mary Kathleen Lane, A/K/A Mary K. Lane, and Ross E. Lane, Her Husband v. W. S. Wallace, M. D., Dan B. Holton, M. D., and W. W. Wersich, M. D.
579 F.2d 1200 (Tenth Circuit, 1978)
United States v. Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc.
667 F. Supp. 370 (N.D. Texas, 1986)
Shafer v. Commander, Army & Air Force Exchange Service
667 F. Supp. 414 (N.D. Texas, 1985)
Robinson v. Pioche, Bayerque & Co.
5 Cal. 460 (California Supreme Court, 1855)