Devereaux v. Clifford

42 N.Y.S. 687
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 18, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

LANDON, J.

The conviction for contempt was proper, but, in the absence of evidence that the defendant’s disobedience occasioned any actual loss or injury to the plaintiffs beyond the costs and expenses of this proceeding to punish him, the fine to the amount of the judgment was not authorized. Code Civ. Proc. § 2284; Coal Co. v. Hecksher, 42 Hun, 534.

Order affirmed as to the conviction, reversed as to the fine, and proceeding remitted to the special term, as in the case cited, for further order in respect to the fine, with $10 costs and disbursements to appellant. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Devereaux v. Clifford, 42 N.Y.S. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

42 N.Y.S. 687 (Devereaux v. Clifford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Friedman v. Newman
86 N.Y.S. 735 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1904)