Devereaux v. Clifford
This text of 11 A.D. 401 (Devereaux v. Clifford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The conviction for contempt was proper, but, in the absence of evidence that the defendant’s disobedience occasioned any actual loss or injury to the plaintiff, beyond the costs and expenses of this proceeding to punish him, the fine to the amount of the judgment was hot authorized. (Code Civ. Proc. § 2284; Fall Brook Coal Co. v, Hecksher, 42 Hun, 534.)
The order should be affirmed as to the conviction, reversed as to the fine, and the proceeding remitted to the Special Term, as in the case cited, for further order in respect to the fine, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant.
All concurred.
Order affirmed as to conviction, reversed as to the fine, and the proceedings remitted to the Special Term for further action, with ten dollars costs and disbursements of this appeal to the appellant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 A.D. 401, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/devereaux-v-clifford-nyappdiv-1896.