Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Kingman Holdings, LLC

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided September 2, 2015·No. 05-14-00855-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered September 2, 2015

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-14-00855-CV

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, IN TRUST FOR THE REGISTERED HOLDERS OF MORGAN STANLEY ABS CAPITAL I TRUST 2006-NC-5, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006 NC5, Appellant

V.

KINGMAN HOLDINGS, LLC, AS TRUSTEE FOR THE MAHOGANY 1587 LAND TRUST, Appellee

On Appeal from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-04363-2013

ORDER The Court has before it Kevin Alaimo’s August 31, 2015 “Motion to Intervene” as an

appellee in this appeal. Appellant opposes Alaimo’s motion to intervene as an appellee. Oral

submission of this appeal is scheduled for September 15, 2015.

We REQUEST appellant to file any response to Alaimo’s motion to intervene on or

before Tuesday, September 8, 2015. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Any response to Alaimo’s motion

to intervene shall be limited to addressing the virtual-representation doctrine and factors

concerning the timeliness of Alaimo’s motion to intervene contained in In re Lumbermens

Mutual Casualty Company, 184 S.W.3d 718, 723–28 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding). We DIRECT the Clerk to forward this order to the attorneys of record for appellant and

appellee, and to attorney for Alaimo, Jeremy T. Brown, Irelan McDaniel, PLLC, 10440 N.

Central Expressway, Suite 800, Dallas, TX 75231.

/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Kingman Holdings, LLC, (Tex. Ct. App. 2015).

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Kingman Holdings, LLC (Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Kingman Holdings, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
184 S.W.3d 718 (Texas Supreme Court, 2006)