Deutsch v. Roy

232 A.D. 549, 250 N.Y.S. 669, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13880

This text of 232 A.D. 549 (Deutsch v. Roy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deutsch v. Roy, 232 A.D. 549, 250 N.Y.S. 669, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Martin, J.

We have held that the complaint in Deutsch v. Roy (232 App. Div. 543) should not have been dismissed. Although this matter was properly disposed of by the Special Term, in view of our ruling in the action of Deutsch v. Roy, decided herewith, the order herein must be reversed and the lis pendens reinstated.

The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the notice of pendency of action reinstated.

Finch, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley and Townley, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, and the notice of pendency of action reinstated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Deutsch v. Roy
232 A.D. 543 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 A.D. 549, 250 N.Y.S. 669, 1931 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deutsch-v-roy-nyappdiv-1931.