Detweiler Mercantile Co. v. Babcock

260 P. 162, 44 Idaho 777, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 163
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1927
DocketNo. 5122.
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 260 P. 162 (Detweiler Mercantile Co. v. Babcock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Detweiler Mercantile Co. v. Babcock, 260 P. 162, 44 Idaho 777, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 163 (Idaho 1927).

Opinion

GIVENS, J.

Petitioner sought a writ of mandate to require the Honorable William A. Babcock, one of the judges of the district court of the eleventh judicial district, Twin Falls county, to set aside and annul a judgment and decree entered by him dissolving a temporary injunction and dismissing the action in which the temporary injunction had been issued. The injunction was sought for the purpose *778 of restraining the defendants as a school board from accepting a bid, and paying for a certain quantity of coal, from the Filer Elevator Company, on the ground that their action in so doing was discriminatory and contrary to law because petitioner had presented a lower bid.

It appears from the record that after .the temporary injunction was dissolved the coal was purchased and paid for. The substance of the controversy has therefore disappeared, since the only relief sought was injunctive, and only a moot question remains to be determined, and nothing this court could do or direct the trial court to do would afford any relief to petitioner and this court will not consider such a ease. (Porter v. Speno, 13 Ida. 600, 92 Pac. 367; Abels v. Turner Trust Co., 31 Ida. 777, 176 Pac. 884; Adamson v. Moyes, 32 Ida. 469, 184 Pac. 849; 1 C. J. 973.) This conclusion renders it unnecessary to consider or pass upon the questions of practice and procedure raised by petitioner.

The writ is denied and costs'are awarded to defendants.

Wm. E. Lee, C. J., and Taylor and T. Bailey Lee, JJ., concur. Budge, J., took no part in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fischer v. Board of Trustees
965 P.2d 1292 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1998)
Johnson v. Bonner County School District No. 82
887 P.2d 35 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1994)
Nelson v. Marshall
497 P.2d 47 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1972)
Dorman v. Young
332 P.2d 480 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1958)
Doolittle v. Morley
278 P.2d 996 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1955)
State Tax Commission v. Johnson
269 P.2d 1080 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1954)
Kootenai County v. White
27 P.2d 977 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1933)
Kiefer v. City of Idaho Falls
265 P. 701 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 P. 162, 44 Idaho 777, 1927 Ida. LEXIS 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/detweiler-mercantile-co-v-babcock-idaho-1927.