Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills v. Wise

297 F. 460, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided March 10, 1924·No. No. 228·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Every agreement is the result of an offer and an acceptance thereof. The acceptance is required to be identical with the offer, or there is no meeting of minds. Neer v. Lang, 252 Fed. 575, 164 C. C. A. 491. This is true, although there may be some matters not . material omitted from both offer and acceptance. West India, etc., Co. v. Chicago, etc., Co., 249 Fed. 338, 161 C. C. A. 346.

It is a question of fact only, to decide from uncontradicted evidence, whether the minds of the parties did meet. The court below held that there was no such meeting. We are of the same opinion, and it would serve no useful purpose to dwell upon the details.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills v. Wise, 297 F. 460, 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2843 (2d Cir. 1924).

297 F. 460 (Detroit Copper & Brass Rolling Mills v. Wise) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kogan v. Facebook, Inc.
S.D. New York, 2020
Department of Banking v. Stenger
272 N.W. 403 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1937)
Northeastern Const. Co. v. City of Winston-Salem
83 F.2d 57 (Fourth Circuit, 1936)
Armistead v. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co.
14 Tenn. App. 434 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1932)