Desue v. State
917 So. 2d 223, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18656, 2005 WL 3143636
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 28, 2005·No. No. 1D91-1640·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Because appellant has completed his sentence, we dismiss his motion to enforce mandate on the ground of mootness. See, e.g., Maybin v. State, 884 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004); Sneed v. State, 749 So.2d 545 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Miller v. State, 435 So.2d 258 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Desue v. State, 917 So. 2d 223, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 18656, 2005 WL 3143636 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
917 So. 2d 223 (Desue v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2024