Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida
This text of Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida (Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed June 5, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D23-2181 Lower Tribunal No. F06-34231B ________________
Augustin Fleurimond, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.
Clayton R. Kaeiser, P.A., and Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 435 So. 2d 258, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983);
Desue v. State, 917 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); see also Coughlin v.
State, 932 So. 2d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[A] traditional double
jeopardy challenge attacks both the conviction and, by default, the sentence,
while rule 3.800(a) is limited to claims that a sentence itself is illegal, without
regard to the underlying conviction.”).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/augustin-fleurimond-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2024.