Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 2024·No. 2023-2181·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 5, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-2181 Lower Tribunal No. F06-34231B ________________

Augustin Fleurimond, Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Tanya Brinkley, Judge.

Clayton R. Kaeiser, P.A., and Clayton R. Kaeiser, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General and Richard L. Polin, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Miller v. State, 435 So. 2d 258, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983);

Desue v. State, 917 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); see also Coughlin v.

State, 932 So. 2d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (“[A] traditional double

jeopardy challenge attacks both the conviction and, by default, the sentence,

while rule 3.800(a) is limited to claims that a sentence itself is illegal, without

regard to the underlying conviction.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2024).

Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida (Augustin Fleurimond v. The State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coughlin v. State
932 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Miller v. State
435 So. 2d 258 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Desue v. State
917 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)