DeStael v. Strasburg

25 Am. Samoa 2d 96
CourtHigh Court of American Samoa
DecidedDecember 17, 1993
DocketCA No. 121-93
StatusPublished

This text of 25 Am. Samoa 2d 96 (DeStael v. Strasburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering High Court of American Samoa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
DeStael v. Strasburg, 25 Am. Samoa 2d 96 (amsamoa 1993).

Opinion

Order on Motions for Permanent Injunction and Enforcement of Foreign Judgment:

On August 25, 1993, a Judgment and Decree of Dissolution of Marriage was filed in the Circuit Court for Multnomah County, Oregon. Subsequently, defendant entered American Samoa aboard the yacht "Pangaea," a marital asset. On November 19, 1993, the High Court issued a preliminary injunction barring defendant from "entering onto, interfering with, or damaging the yacht." On December 16, 1993, a hearing was held concerning plaintiff’s motion for enforcement of a foreign judgment and her motion for a permanent injunction.

[97]*97The High Court is empowered to enforce a judgment of any United States court or other court entitled to full faith and credit in American Samoa under the "Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act." A.S.C.A. §§ 43.1701-43.1709; see 28 U.S.C. § 1738. In this, regard, the general rule is that a court may not relitigate the merits of the original action or consider a defense that could have been raised in the original action. Bahr v. Bahr, 180 N.W.2d 465, 467 (S.D. 1970) (citing Picking v. Local Loan Co., 44 A.2d 462, 468 (Md. App. 1945)); see Klee v. Cola, 401 So. 2d 871, 872 (Fla. App. 1981) (citing Whiteside v. Dinkins, 97 So. 517 (Fla. 1923)).

In granting the divorce decree, the Oregon court made a factual finding that DeStael was a resident under the residency/domicile requirement of Or. Rev. Stat. § 107.075. This court is thus precluded from questioning the Oregon court’s findings of fact and its corresponding interpretation of Oregon law. Therefore, plaintiff’s motions are granted.

It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bahr v. Bahr
180 N.W.2d 465 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1970)
Picking v. Local Loan Co.
44 A.2d 462 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1945)
Whiteside v. Dinkins
97 So. 517 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)
Klee v. Cola
401 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
25 Am. Samoa 2d 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/destael-v-strasburg-amsamoa-1993.