Dessel v. Dessel

299 A.2d 409, 62 N.J. 141, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 230
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 22, 1973
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 299 A.2d 409 (Dessel v. Dessel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dessel v. Dessel, 299 A.2d 409, 62 N.J. 141, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 230 (N.J. 1973).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The Appellate Division’s judgment of reversal and remand is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth in its per curiam reported at 122 N. J. Super. 119 (1972).

For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conrord, Sullivan and Lewis — 6.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Bronson v. Bronson
527 A.2d 943 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Pascale v. Pascale
523 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Campagna v. United States
474 F. Supp. 573 (D. New Jersey, 1979)
Hyland v. Simmons
378 A.2d 260 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 A.2d 409, 62 N.J. 141, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dessel-v-dessel-nj-1973.