Dessel v. Dessel
299 A.2d 409, 62 N.J. 141, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 230
Opinion
The Appellate Division’s judgment of reversal and remand is affirmed, essentially for the reasons set forth in its per curiam reported at 122 N. J. Super. 119 (1972).
For affirmance — Justices Jacobs, Hall and Mountain, and Judges Conrord, Sullivan and Lewis — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dessel v. Dessel, 299 A.2d 409, 62 N.J. 141, 1973 N.J. LEXIS 230 (N.J. 1973).
299 A.2d 409 (Dessel v. Dessel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
JANETTE FAULK, ETC. VS. ANNE MARTUCCI (C-000160-18, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2021
JENNIFER K. ALLEN, ETC. VS. ESTATE OF DONALD L. ALLEN (C-000060-16, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)
New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2019
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Bronson v. Bronson
527 A.2d 943 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Pascale v. Pascale
523 A.2d 233 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1987)
Campagna v. United States
474 F. Supp. 573 (D. New Jersey, 1979)
Hyland v. Simmons
378 A.2d 260 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)