Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation

DecidedJanuary 24, 2008

Docket14-06-00703-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation (Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to Correct Denied as Moot, Opinion of October 30, 2007, Vacated and Dismissed and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008

Motion to Correct Denied as Moot, Opinion of October 30, 2007, Vacated, Dismissed and, Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00703-CV

DESIGN ELECTRIC, Appellant

V.

CADENCE MCSHANE CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-18475

S U B S T I T U T E M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 15, 2006. On October 30, 2007, this court issued an opinion, affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part. On November 8, 2007, appellant filed a motion to correct the opinion, which we construe to be a motion for rehearing, extending our plenary power. On January 11, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties have settled the case. We deny the motion to correct as moot, grant the motion to dismiss, vacate our opinion of October 30, 2007, and issue this substitute opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Edelman.^*

^* Senior Justice Richard H. Edelman sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to Correct Denied as Moot, Opinion of October 30, 2007, Vacated and Dismissed and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008

Motion to Correct Denied as Moot, Opinion of October 30, 2007, Vacated, Dismissed and, Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00703-CV

DESIGN ELECTRIC, Appellant

V.

CADENCE MCSHANE CORPORATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 281st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2004-18475

S U B S T I T U T E M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed May 15, 2006. On October 30, 2007, this court issued an opinion, affirming in part and reversing and remanding in part. On November 8, 2007, appellant filed a motion to correct the opinion, which we construe to be a motion for rehearing, extending our plenary power. On January 11, 2008, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal because the parties have settled the case. We deny the motion to correct as moot, grant the motion to dismiss, vacate our opinion of October 30, 2007, and issue this substitute opinion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Substitute Memorandum Opinion filed January 24, 2008.

Panel consists of Justices Yates, Seymore, and Edelman.^*

^* Senior Justice Richard H. Edelman sitting by assignment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Design Electric v. Cadence McShane Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/design-electric-v-cadence-mcshane-corporation-texapp-2008.