Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
This text of 250 P.3d 196 (Desert Mountain Properties Limited Partnership v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
¶ 1 We granted review in this ease to consider (1) whether a commercial general liability (CGL) policy covers an insured’s contractual liability for damage that caused only economic loss, (2) whether the CGL policy’s contractual liability exclusion applies only when an insured has “assumed” another’s liability by agreeing to indemnify or hold another harmless, and (3) whether an insured’s voluntary expenditures to repair property damage caused by construction defects resulted from a “legal obligation” to pay “damages.” We have jurisdiction under Article 6, Section 5(3) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 12-120.24 (2003).
¶ 2 After considering the briefs and oral arguments, the Court affirms the opinion of the court of appeals on these issues for the reasons set forth therein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 P.3d 196, 226 Ariz. 419, 2011 Ariz. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desert-mountain-properties-limited-partnership-v-liberty-mutual-fire-ariz-2011.