DeSapio v. Koch

New York Court of Appeals

DeSapio v. Koch

199 N.E.2d 385, 14 N.Y.2d 735, 250 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1159

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 7, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 199 N.E.2d 385 (DeSapio v. Koch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

DeSapio v. Koch, 199 N.E.2d 385, 14 N.Y.2d 735, 250 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1159 (N.Y. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

At the Democratic primary election held September 5,1963 for the party position of Male Leader of the First Assembly District, Part A, New York County, the official canvass recorded the election of the respondent, Edward I. Koch, by 41 votes out of a total of more than 9,000 east.

The petitioner, DeSapio, instituted this proceeding, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 330 of the Election Law, for an order directing a holding of a new primary election for the party position involved, on the ground that 65 specific, identifiable votes cast were invalid and should not have been counted. Concededly, 45 of the contested votes were cast by persons who did not sign the registration poll records.

The Special Term, after a hearing, sustained objections to 15 votes cast by persons who had not signed the registration poll records and 20 cast by persons who either were not enrolled in the Democratic party or did not reside in the district, a total of 35 votes, and dismissed the objections to the remaining 30.

The Appellate Division affirmed the Special Term by a divided court, one Justice dissenting. The only issue is whether, in addition to the 35 votes found to be invalid, the court below should have invalidated also 30 votes concededly cast by persons who failed to sign the registration poll records. We think the votes so cast were invalid and should not have been counted (N. Y. Const., art. II, § 7; Election Law, § 413). We may not, however, declare petitioner DeSapio the winner, since the irregularities in the election were such “ as to render impossible a determination as to who rightfully was nominated or elected ’ ’ (Election Law, § 330, subd. 2).

[737]*737The order appealed from should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term, Supreme Court, New York County, for the entry of an order granting the relief prayed for in the petition, with instructions to order a new primary election for the office of Male Leader of the First Assembly District, Part A, New York County. •

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

At the Democratic primary election held September 5,1963 for the party position of Male Leader of the First Assembly District, Part A, New York County, the official canvass recorded the election of the respondent, Edward I. Koch, by 41 votes out of a total of more than 9,000 east.

The petitioner, DeSapio, instituted this proceeding, pursuant to subdivision 2 of section 330 of the Election Law, for an order directing a holding of a new primary election for the party position involved, on the ground that 65 specific, identifiable votes cast were invalid and should not have been counted. Concededly, 45 of the contested votes were cast by persons who did not sign the registration poll records.

The Special Term, after a hearing, sustained objections to 15 votes cast by persons who had not signed the registration poll records and 20 cast by persons who either were not enrolled in the Democratic party or did not reside in the district, a total of 35 votes, and dismissed the objections to the remaining 30.

The Appellate Division affirmed the Special Term by a divided court, one Justice dissenting. The only issue is whether, in addition to the 35 votes found to be invalid, the court below should have invalidated also 30 votes concededly cast by persons who failed to sign the registration poll records. We think the votes so cast were invalid and should not have been counted (N. Y. Const., art. II, § 7; Election Law, § 413). We may not, however, declare petitioner DeSapio the winner, since the irregularities in the election were such “ as to render impossible a determination as to who rightfully was nominated or elected ’ ’ (Election Law, § 330, subd. 2).

[737]*737The order appealed from should be reversed, without costs, and the matter remitted to the Special Term, Supreme Court, New York County, for the entry of an order granting the relief prayed for in the petition, with instructions to order a new primary election for the office of Male Leader of the First Assembly District, Part A, New York County. •

Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 N.E.2d 385, 14 N.Y.2d 735, 250 N.Y.S.2d 295, 1964 N.Y. LEXIS 1159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/desapio-v-koch-ny-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack