Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds

Ninth Circuit

Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds

849 F.2d 1259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788, 1988 WL 66021

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 29, 1988

Docket88-1774

StatusPublished

Cited by13 cases

This text of 849 F.2d 1259 (Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds, 849 F.2d 1259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788, 1988 WL 66021 (9th Cir. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir.1982). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir.1982). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

849 F.2d 1259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788, 1988 WL 66021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/derek-a-mccall-v-george-deeds-ca9-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack