Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds
849 F.2d 1259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788, 1988 WL 66021
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 29, 1988·No. 88-1774·Published·Cited by 13 cases
Opinion
Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir.1982). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted.
Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds, 849 F.2d 1259, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788, 1988 WL 66021 (9th Cir. 1988).
849 F.2d 1259 (Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Kish
2024 ND 76 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 2024)
In re: Terrance Alexander Tomkow Zafar David Khan
Ninth Circuit, 2017
Freddie Lewis v. Sheriff's Dept Bossier Parish, et
478 F. App'x 809 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Cruey v. Early
396 F. App'x 940 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Wansley v. Speed Corp.
900 So. 2d 1167 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 2005)
Ed Wansley v. Speed Corporation
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2002
Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co.
977 P.2d 769 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1999)
Alfredo Patrick Acosta, and Rose Malfabon, Applicant-In-Intervention/appellant v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., a California Corporation
24 F.3d 244 (Ninth Circuit, 1994)
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.
874 F.2d 1346 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)
Tri-State Generation And Transmission Association, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc.
874 F.2d 1346 (Tenth Circuit, 1989)