Dequintavious Rivers v. Logan L. McCullers

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 2, 2023
DocketA23A0554
StatusPublished

This text of Dequintavious Rivers v. Logan L. McCullers (Dequintavious Rivers v. Logan L. McCullers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dequintavious Rivers v. Logan L. McCullers, (Ga. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

FIRST DIVISION BARNES, P. J., DOYLE, P. J., and LAND, J.

NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules

May 2, 2023

In the Court of Appeals of Georgia A23A0554. RIVERS v. McCULLERS.

DOYLE, Presiding Judge.

Dequintavious Rivers, plaintiff in the action below, appeals from the trial

court’s order dismissing his appeal as untimely. We conclude that the trial court’s

order must be vacated because a trial court is not authorized to dismiss an appeal on

that ground. Additionally, for the reasons discussed below, we dismiss the appeal.

In September 2019, Rivers sued Logan L. McCullers for damages allegedly

arising from a motor vehicle collision. In August 2020, upon McCullers’s motion, the

trial court dismissed the complaint based on lack of service and expiration of the

statute of limitations. Rivers filed a motion to vacate the dismissal order, which the

trial court denied on November 3, 2020. On December 2, 2020, Rivers filed a notice

of appeal to this Court. McCullers moved to dismiss the appeal, and the trial court granted that motion on August 17, 2022. Rivers then filed an application for

discretionary appeal, which we granted under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j) because Rivers had

a right of direct appeal from the trial court’s August 2022 order dismissing his appeal.

Rivers subsequently filed this appeal.

1. We first address the trial court’s August 2022 order dismissing Rivers’s

December 2020 notice of appeal. “An appellate court is the sole authority in

determining whether a filed notice of appeal or discretionary application is sufficient

to invoke its jurisdiction.”1 While OCGA § 5-6-48 (b) (1) provides for dismissal of

an appeal due to an appellant’s failure to timely file a notice of appeal, “Georgia law

does not contemplate such a dismissal by the trial court[.]”2 The trial court did not

have authority to dismiss Rivers’s appeal on this ground.3 Therefore, the trial court’s

order dismissing the notice of appeal is hereby vacated.4

1 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Jones v. Peach Trader, Inc., 302 Ga. 504, 506 (II) (807 SE2d 840) (2017). 2 (Emphasis supplied.) Id. at 507 (II). 3 See Jones, 302 Ga. at 511 (II); Vieyra v. State, 353 Ga. App. 402, 403 (2) (837 SE2d 715) (2020). 4 See Vieyra, 353 Ga. App. at 403 (2).

2 2. Having determined that the trial court exceeded its authority when it

dismissed Rivers’s December 2020 notice of appeal, that notice of appeal is now

before us.5 We conclude that the appeal must be dismissed because the notice of

appeal is untimely as to the August 2020 order and the November 2020 order is not

subject to direct appeal.

The proper and timely filing of a notice of appeal is an absolute requirement

to confer jurisdiction on this Court.6 Under OCGA § 5-6-38 (a), a notice of appeal is

timely if it is filed within 30 days after entry of the order on appeal.

Here, the trial court’s order dismissing the action was entered on August 18,

2020, and Rivers filed his notice of appeal on December 2, 2020, which was 106 days

later. The notice of appeal was, therefore, untimely as to that order.

The trial court’s order denying Rivers’s motion to vacate was entered on

November 3, 2020, so the notice of appeal is timely as to that order. However, that

order is not subject to direct appeal. In his motion to vacate, Rivers asked the trial

court to vacate its order dismissing his case in order to consider Rivers’s response to

McCullers’s motion to dismiss. To the extent the motion was a motion to set aside

5 See Jones, 302 Ga. at 511 (III). 6 Davis v. State, 330 Ga. App. 711 (769 SE2d 133) (2015).

3 under OCGA § 9-11-60 (d), Rivers was required to file an application for

discretionary appeal to obtain appellate review of the trial court’s order denying his

motion.7 To the extent the motion to vacate was a motion for reconsideration, the

denial of a motion for reconsideration is not appealable in its own right.8

Consequently, Rivers’s notice of direct appeal does not confer jurisdiction on this

Court, and this appeal must be dismissed.

Order vacated and appeal dismissed. Barnes, P. J., and Land, J., concur.

7 See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8), (b); Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson, 283 Ga. App. 116, 116 (640 SE2d 688) (2006). 8 See Bell v. Cohran, 244 Ga. App. 510, 510-511 (536 SE2d 187) (2000); Savage v. Newsome, 173 Ga. App. 271, 271 (326 SE2d 5) (1985).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jim Ellis Atlanta, Inc. v. Adamson
640 S.E.2d 688 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Bell v. Cohran
536 S.E.2d 187 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2000)
Davis v. the State
769 S.E.2d 133 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2015)
Jones v. Peach Trader Inc.
807 S.E.2d 840 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2017)
Savage v. Newsome
326 S.E.2d 5 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Dequintavious Rivers v. Logan L. McCullers, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dequintavious-rivers-v-logan-l-mccullers-gactapp-2023.