Department of Transportation v. Federal Express Corp.

579 S.E.2d 827, 260 Ga. App. 354, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1056, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 377
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Department of Transportation v. Federal Express Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 254 Ga. App. 149
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 19, 2003·No. A01A2476·Published

Opinion

Miller, Judge.

In Dept. of Transp. v. Montgomery Tank Lines, 276 Ga. 105 (575 SE2d 487) (2003), the Supreme Court affirmed in part and vacated in part this Court’s decision in Dept. of Transp. v. Fed. Express Corp., 254 Ga. App. 149 (561 SE2d 470) (2002). While affirming our decision, the Supreme Court further held that we prematurely decided whether the alleged tortious activity of the State fell within an exception set forth in OCGA § 50-21-25. Accordingly, the judgment of this Court is vacated insofar as it decides that issue, and the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court in that respect.

Judgment affirmed.

Andrews, P. J., and Eldridge, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Department of Transportation v. Federal Express Corp., 579 S.E.2d 827, 260 Ga. App. 354, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1056, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 377 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

579 S.E.2d 827 (Department of Transportation v. Federal Express Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Department of Transportation v. Montgomery Tank Lines, Inc.
575 S.E.2d 487 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2003)
Department of Transportation v. Federal Express Corp.
561 S.E.2d 470 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)