Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation v. Abateco Services, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation v. Abateco Services, Inc.

547 S.E.2d 529, 35 Va. App. 644, 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 385

CourtCourt of Appeals of Virginia

DecidedJune 19, 2001

DocketRecord Nos. 1719-99-2, 1780-99-2

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 547 S.E.2d 529 (Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation v. Abateco Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Department of Professional & Occupational Regulation v. Abateco Services, Inc., 547 S.E.2d 529, 35 Va. App. 644, 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 385 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

By published opinion dated, September 26, 2000, a divided panel of this Court reversed and remanded the decision of the trial court as to Record Number 1719-99-2, and affirmed the decision of the trial court as to Record Number 1780-99-2. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, Board for Asbestos and Lead v. Abateco Services, Inc. and Abateco Services, Inc. v. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, Board for Asbestos and Lead, 33 Va.App. 473, 534 S.E.2d 352 (2000). We stayed the mandates of that decision and granted rehearing en banc.

Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of the September 26, 2000 mandates is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded as to Record Number 1719-99-2 and affirmed as to Record Number 1780-99-2 for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion.

Judges Benton and Annunziata dissent for the reasons set forth in the panel dissent. See id. at 484-94, 534 S.E.2d at 358-63.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UPON A REHEARING EN BANC

By published opinion dated, September 26, 2000, a divided panel of this Court reversed and remanded the decision of the trial court as to Record Number 1719-99-2, and affirmed the decision of the trial court as to Record Number 1780-99-2. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, Board for Asbestos and Lead v. Abateco Services, Inc. and Abateco Services, Inc. v. Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, Board for Asbestos and Lead, 33 Va.App. 473, 534 S.E.2d 352 (2000). We stayed the mandates of that decision and granted rehearing en banc.

Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of the September 26, 2000 mandates is lifted, and the judgment of the trial court is reversed and remanded as to Record Number 1719-99-2 and affirmed as to Record Number 1780-99-2 for the reasons set forth in the majority panel opinion.

Judges Benton and Annunziata dissent for the reasons set forth in the panel dissent. See id. at 484-94, 534 S.E.2d at 358-63.

This order shall be published and certified to the trial court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 S.E.2d 529, 35 Va. App. 644, 2001 Va. App. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-professional-occupational-regulation-v-abateco-services-vactapp-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack