Department of Human Resources v. Sims

222 S.E.2d 832, 137 Ga. App. 72, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1206

• Court: Court of Appeals of Georgia
• Decided: November 7, 1975
• Docket: 51004
• Status: Published

Opinions

Evans, Judge.

Mrs Mary R. Sims was employed as a case work aide in the Meriwether County Department of Family and Children Services (now Georgia Department of Human Resources). After a probationary period, she became a tenured employee. During the latter part of 1973 and early 1974, difficulties occurred between Mrs. Sims and her supervisor, and she was notified by the county director that her employment was terminated because of the quality of her work and her demonstrated unwillingness or inability to follow her supervisor’s instructions.

An appeal was made to the State Personnel Board. A hearing was held and her appeal was denied. Writ of certiorari to the superior court was sanctioned and after review of the evidence, that court entered an order reversing the State Personnel Board’s decision. The superior court’s judgment held there was a lack of sufficient evidence to justify discharge and the procedure employed did not comport with the minimal constitutional standards of procedural due process. The Department of Human Resources appeals. Held:

1. "All appeals determinations of the board shall be written and documented as to findings of fact, basis for decisions and prescribed remedies.” Code Ann. § 40-2204 (b) (4) (Ga. L. 1975, pp. 79, 85). However, this law does not apply to the case sub judice as it did not become effective until March 13, 1975.

Argued September 9, 1975 Decided November 7, 1975 Rehearing denied December 15, 1975 Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General, R. Douglas Lackey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.

2. The denial of an appeal by the board in the future will require written or documented findings of fact as a basis for the denial.

3. All future findings of fact, basis for decision and prescribed remedies by the board should be written and documented as to comport with the above law.

4. Many of the rules of the personnel board are herein referred to. But a certified copy of the rules is not in the record. This state board is not governed by the Administrative Procedures Act (Georgia Laws 1964, p. 338 et seq.). Thereupon the courts cannot take judicial notice of said rules. See Code Ann. § 3A-108. Since the rules of the State Personnel Board are not before us, we are unable to determine if the lower court was correct in holding that the procedure employed did not comport with the minimal constitutional standards of procedural due process.

5. As has been held in a number of decisions including Dougherty County Council v. Beckanstin, 100 Ga. App. 790, 792 (1) (112 SE2d 423), "the effect of sustaining a certiorari is the same as the first grant of a new trial,” citing Jeffers v. Central of Georgia R. Co., 1 Ga. App. 331 (57 SE 923); Folds v. Harris, 34 Ga. App. 445 (129 SE 664); Peacock v. American Plant Co., 49 Ga. App. 267 (175 SE 262). Since the evidence presented to and considered by the trial judge is in conflict, there was no error in sustaining the certiorari.

6. For the foregoing reason, the lower court did not err in sustaining the application for certiorari and reversing the decision of the board.

Judgment affirmed.

Deen, P. J., concurs. Stolz, J., concurs specially. Hicks, Huddleston & Medori, Charles F. Hicks, for appellee.