Department of Corrections v. Saulter
751 So. 2d 163, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 940, 2000 WL 125965
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 4, 2000·No. No. 1D99-4080·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Having considered appellant’s response to the court’s show cause order, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections, 726 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(stating that an order that determines entitlement to back-pay, but leaves open the amount due is interlocutory in nature). The dismissal is without prejudice to file a notice of appeal when a final order is rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Department of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So. 2d 163, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 940, 2000 WL 125965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
751 So. 2d 163 (Department of Corrections v. Saulter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Florida Department of Corrections v. Schwarz
134 So. 3d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Smith
980 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Lazy Days' RV Center, Inc. v. Shepley
929 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Department of Corrections v. Chesnut
847 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
INVERNESS HEALTHCARE CENTER v. Cote
751 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)