Department of Corrections v. Saulter

751 So. 2d 163, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 940, 2000 WL 125965
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 4, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-4080
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 751 So. 2d 163 (Department of Corrections v. Saulter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So. 2d 163, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 940, 2000 WL 125965 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to the court’s show cause order, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Mathis v. Florida Department of Corrections, 726 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999)(stating that an order that determines entitlement to back-pay, but leaves open the amount due is interlocutory in nature). The dismissal is without prejudice to file a notice of appeal when a final order is rendered.

KAHN, BENTON, AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florida Department of Corrections v. Schwarz
134 So. 3d 1002 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Smith
980 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Lazy Days' RV Center, Inc. v. Shepley
929 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Department of Corrections v. Chesnut
847 So. 2d 575 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
INVERNESS HEALTHCARE CENTER v. Cote
751 So. 2d 163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
751 So. 2d 163, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 940, 2000 WL 125965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-corrections-v-saulter-fladistctapp-2000.