Department of Corrections v. Chesnut

847 So. 2d 575, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2003 WL 21371852
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 2003
Docket1D03-1192
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 847 So. 2d 575 (Department of Corrections v. Chesnut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Corrections v. Chesnut, 847 So. 2d 575, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2003 WL 21371852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

847 So.2d 575 (2003)

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Appellant.
v.
Benny CHESNUT, Appellee.

No. 1D03-1192.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 16, 2003.

Gary Lavon Grant, Assistant General Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ben R. Patterson of Patterson & Traynham, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Stephen A. Meek, and Jerry Chatham, Tallahassee, for Public Employees Relations Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of April 14, 2003, as well as the response filed by the Public Employees Relations Commission, the Court has determined that the order is not a final appealable order. See Dep't of Corrections v. Saulter, 751 So.2d 163 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000); see also Mathis v. Dep't of Corrections, 726 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

ERVIN, KAHN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS v. Smith
980 So. 2d 606 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
847 So. 2d 575, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2003 WL 21371852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-corrections-v-chesnut-fladistctapp-2003.