Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt

536 So. 2d 305, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560, 1988 WL 133953
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 1988
DocketNo. 88-217
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 536 So. 2d 305 (Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt, 536 So. 2d 305, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560, 1988 WL 133953 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

SHIVERS, Judge.

We affirm this workers’ compensation order except for that part of the order denying payment of Dr. Chokhawala’s bills. In the decretal portion of the order the payment of Dr. Chokhawala’s bills is denied but there is award of Dr. Chokhawa-la’s bills in paragraph eleven of the order. We remand for correction of this inconsistency.

AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED.

BOOTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brower v. Certified Grocers
581 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
DeLeon v. State
536 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
536 So. 2d 305, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560, 1988 WL 133953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/department-of-business-regulation-v-dearmitt-fladistctapp-1988.