Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt
536 So. 2d 305, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560, 1988 WL 133953
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 15, 1988·No. No. 88-217·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm this workers’ compensation order except for that part of the order denying payment of Dr. Chokhawala’s bills. In the decretal portion of the order the payment of Dr. Chokhawala’s bills is denied but there is award of Dr. Chokhawa-la’s bills in paragraph eleven of the order. We remand for correction of this inconsistency.
AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt, 536 So. 2d 305, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5560, 1988 WL 133953 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).
536 So. 2d 305 (Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brower v. Certified Grocers
581 So. 2d 1011 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
DeLeon v. State
536 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)