Brower v. Certified Grocers
This text of 581 So. 2d 1011 (Brower v. Certified Grocers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm this workers’ compensation order except for that part of the order denying payment of Dr. Faris’ bills. The judge of compensation claims found that Dr. Faris was authorized; but such a finding is inconsistent with the denial of payment of Dr. Faris’ bills. Because of the internal inconsistency in the order, we reverse and remand for clarification or modification. Gulf Life Ins. v. Mullaly, 566 So.2d 873 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Department of Business Regulation v. DeArmitt, 536 So.2d 305 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).
AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part and REMANDED for clarification and/or modification.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
581 So. 2d 1011, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 7403, 1991 WL 133426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brower-v-certified-grocers-fladistctapp-1991.