Deonarinesingh v. State

98 So. 3d 665, 2012 WL 4448922, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 27, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-3967
StatusPublished

This text of 98 So. 3d 665 (Deonarinesingh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Deonarinesingh v. State, 98 So. 3d 665, 2012 WL 4448922, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the order summarily denying appellant’s petition and amended petition for writ of error coram nobis which attempted to challenge his 1997 plea. The circuit court properly treated the petition as a motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, which has supplanted the need for the writ of error coram nobis. Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592, 594-95 (Fla.1999).

[666]*666Appellant’s motion was untimely pursuant to rule 3.850(b). Appellant’s claim that the trial court failed to advise him of deportation consequences was not brought within the two-year window created by State v. Green, 944 So.2d 208 (Fla.2006). Appellant has not demonstrated, as Green requires, how he can conclusively show that the warning was not given. Id. at 218. Appellant has not provided a transcript of the plea colloquy, and the state notes that appellant signed and initialed a plea form which advised of the possibility of deportation. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.172(c)(8).

Padilla v. Kentucky, — U.S.-, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive. Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011), rev. granted, 81 So.3d 414 (Fla.2012); Arellano v. State, 90 So.3d 923, 923-24 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012). Further, appellant concedes that he has two federal convictions which may subject him to deportation. Thus, he has not shown that the plea in this case was the sole basis for his deportation. Buton v. State, 995 So.2d 1130, 1132 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

POLEN, Taylor and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Padilla v. Kentucky
559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court, 2010)
State v. Green
944 So. 2d 208 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Buton v. State
995 So. 2d 1130 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Wood v. State
750 So. 2d 592 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Hernandez v. State
61 So. 3d 1144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Arellano v. State
90 So. 3d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 So. 3d 665, 2012 WL 4448922, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 16172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/deonarinesingh-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.