Arellano v. State
90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327927, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9946
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 20, 2012·No. No. 4D11-1452·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (Padilla v. Ky., — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive); [924] Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (immigration warning in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8) overcomes Padilla-based ineffective assistance of counsel claims).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Arellano v. State, 90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327927, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
90 So. 3d 923 (Arellano v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Deonarinesingh v. State
98 So. 3d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)