Arellano v. State
90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327927, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9946
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 20, 2012
DocketNo. 4D11-1452
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 90 So. 3d 923 (Arellano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Arellano v. State, 90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327927, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9946 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).
Opinion
Affirmed. See Hernandez v. State, 61 So.3d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011) (Padilla v. Ky., — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), is not retroactive); [924]*924Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010) (immigration warning in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.172(c)(8) overcomes Padilla-based ineffective assistance of counsel claims).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Deonarinesingh v. State
98 So. 3d 665 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
90 So. 3d 923, 2012 WL 2327927, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 9946, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/arellano-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.