Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Denton v. State

Denton v. State

268 S.E.2d 725, 154 Ga. App. 427, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2209
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 11, 1980
Docket59265
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 268 S.E.2d 725 (Denton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denton v. State, 268 S.E.2d 725, 154 Ga. App. 427, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2209 (Ga. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinions

Shulman, Judge.

Defendants were convicted of possessing obscene devices with intent to sell, in violation of Code Ann. § 26-2101 (c). We affirm.

1. Appellant asserts error in the trial court’s instruction that "every person is assumed to intend the natural and necessary consequences of his act” on the ground that such charge is impermissibly burden shifting under the rationale of Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U. S. 510 (99 SC 2450, 61 LE2d 39).

Although the better practice would be for the trial court to [428]*428expressly advise the jury that the presumption of intent is rebuttable, the court’s charge in this case, when read as a whole, created merely a permissible presumption of criminal intention, and did not create a mandatory presumption of such intent. Therefore, it was neither conclusive nor burden-shifting. Whisenhunt v. State, 152 Ga. App. 829 (264 SE2d 271). See also Skrine v. State, 244 Ga. 520 (260 SE2d 900). We consequently find no error in the charge as given.

Submitted January 9, 1980 Decided April 11, 1980 Rehearing denied April 29, 1980 Glenn Zell, for appellant. Hinson McAuliffe, Solicitor, Leonard W. Rhodes, Assistant Solicitor, for appellee.

2. This appeal was originally filed in the Supreme Court, but was transferred to this court without on opinion. The Supreme Court’s refusal to review defendant’s constitutional challenges to Code Ann. § 26-2101 (c) mandates the finding that appellant’s contentions of error on constitutional grounds are without merit. See Wadley Sou. R. Co. v. Faglee, 42 Ga. App. 80 (1) (155 SE 65), revd. on other grounds, 173 Ga. 814 (161 SE 847).

3. Appellant complains of the charge on scienter. "The charge given here was in the exact language of the Code section and did not place a greater burden on appellant than 'knowledge of the . . . materials he [sought to distribute].’ ” Sewell v. State, 238 Ga. 495, 496 (233 SE2d 187).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P. J., concurs. Carley, J., concurs specially.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hubert v. Turner Outdoor Advertising, Ltd.
344 S.E.2d 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
George v. State
333 S.E.2d 141 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
Edwards v. State
327 S.E.2d 559 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)
McCann v. State
306 S.E.2d 681 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Patterson v. State
291 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Cassells v. Bradlee Management Services, Inc.
291 S.E.2d 48 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1982)
Wallace v. State
282 S.E.2d 325 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1981)
Vaughn v. State
285 S.E.2d 573 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Imperial Body Works, Inc. v. National Claims Service, Inc.
279 S.E.2d 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1981)
Bohin v. State
274 S.E.2d 592 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Denton v. State
268 S.E.2d 725 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 S.E.2d 725, 154 Ga. App. 427, 1980 Ga. App. LEXIS 2209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denton-v-state-gactapp-1980.