Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman

106 A.3d 609, 630 Pa. 214

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman. Read the opinion of the Court — 633 Pa. 205 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 23, 2014·No. Nos. 132 EAL 2014, 133 EAL 2014, 134 EAL 2014·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether records showing the rates dental providers receive for treating Medicaid enrollees are “public records” subject to disclosure under the Righi>-to-Know Law when DPW’s contracts with [MCOjs mandate that it have possession of or “ready access” to such records, and when such records [215]*215directly relate to the governmental function of providing dental care to Medicaid enrollees[.]

The Prothonotary shall establish parallel briefing tracks for this case and Department of Public Welfare v. Eiseman, No. 129-31 EAL 2014, and the two cases, though not consolidated, shall be listed for argument at the same Court session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether records showing the rates dental providers receive for treating Medicaid enrollees are “public records” subject to disclosure under the Righi>-to-Know Law when DPW’s contracts with [MCOjs mandate that it have possession of or “ready access” to such records, and when such records [215]*215directly relate to the governmental function of providing dental care to Medicaid enrollees[.]

Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman, 106 A.3d 609, 630 Pa. 214 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

106 A.3d 609 (Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.