Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman

106 A.3d 609, 630 Pa. 214

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedOctober 23, 2014

DocketNos. 132 EAL 2014, 133 EAL 2014, 134 EAL 2014

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A.3d 609 (Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dental Benefit Providers, Inc. v. Eiseman, 106 A.3d 609, 630 Pa. 214 (Pa. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether records showing the rates dental providers receive for treating Medicaid enrollees are “public records” subject to disclosure under the Righi>-to-Know Law when DPW’s contracts with [MCOjs mandate that it have possession of or “ready access” to such records, and when such records [215]*215directly relate to the governmental function of providing dental care to Medicaid enrollees[.]

The Prothonotary shall establish parallel briefing tracks for this case and Department of Public Welfare v. Eiseman, No. 129-31 EAL 2014, and the two cases, though not consolidated, shall be listed for argument at the same Court session.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 23rd day of October, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issue is:

Whether records showing the rates dental providers receive for treating Medicaid enrollees are “public records” subject to disclosure under the Righi>-to-Know Law when DPW’s contracts with [MCOjs mandate that it have possession of or “ready access” to such records, and when such records [215]*215directly relate to the governmental function of providing dental care to Medicaid enrollees[.]

The Prothonotary shall establish parallel briefing tracks for this case and Department of Public Welfare v. Eiseman, No. 129-31 EAL 2014, and the two cases, though not consolidated, shall be listed for argument at the same Court session.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A.3d 609, 630 Pa. 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dental-benefit-providers-inc-v-eiseman-pa-2014.