Dent v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Dent v. State

70 S.E. 50, 8 Ga. App. 757, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 134

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 7, 1911

Docket3002

StatusPublished

This text of 70 S.E. 50 (Dent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Dent v. State, 70 S.E. 50, 8 Ga. App. 757, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 134 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell,- J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for continuance, under all the circumstances shown.

3. While it is bettfer that the judge, in charging on the statement of the accused, should follow the language of the statute literally, yet there was not such a departure in the present case as to amount to reversible error. ' Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell,- J.

1. The evidence authorized the verdict.

2. The court did not err in overruling the motion for continuance, under all the circumstances shown.

3. While it is bettfer that the judge, in charging on the statement of the accused, should follow the language of the statute literally, yet there was not such a departure in the present case as to amount to reversible error. ' Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 S.E. 50, 8 Ga. App. 757, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dent-v-state-gactapp-1911.