Dent v. State
This text of 80 S.E. 548 (Dent v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. The evidence was sufficient to authorize the verdict finding the defendant guilty. It met with the approval of the trial judge, and we will not disturb it on the ground that it is contrary to evidence.
2. The assignments of error as to the charge of the court; are without merit. The jury was correctly instructed by the court. If any fuller instruction was desired, it should have been requested in writing.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
80 S.E. 548, 14 Ga. App. 270, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dent-v-state-gactapp-1914.