Denny v. Dent County Jail

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedJanuary 29, 2024
Docket4:23-cv-01330
StatusUnknown

This text of Denny v. Dent County Jail (Denny v. Dent County Jail) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Denny v. Dent County Jail, (E.D. Mo. 2024).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES E. DENNY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:23-CV-1330 NCC ) DENT COUNTY JAIL and BOBBY D. ) WELLS, Sheriff, Dent County, Missouri, ) ) Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on review of self-represented plaintiff James Denny’s Affidavit in Support of Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF No. 2). For the reasons discussed below, the Court will order plaintiff to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis and an amended complaint. Initial Partial Filing Fee Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), a prisoner bringing a civil action in forma pauperis is required to pay the full amount of the filing fee. If the prisoner has insufficient funds in his or her prison account to pay the entire fee, the Court must assess and, when funds exist, collect an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (1) the average monthly deposits in the prisoner’s account, or (2) the average monthly balance in the prisoner’s account for the prior six-month period. After payment of the initial partial filing fee, the prisoner is required to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month’s income credited to the prisoner’s account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of the prisoner will forward these monthly payments to the Clerk of Court each time the amount in the prisoner’s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee is fully paid. Id. Although plaintiff has filed an affidavit in support of his purported motion to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff has not yet filed such a motion. Further, plaintiff did not submit a certified copy of his “trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent)” for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint, which is required when seeking in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(h) (defining a “prisoner”

as including a person detained in any facility who is accused of violations of criminal law). Accordingly, the Court will order plaintiff to either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, or pay the Court’s filing fee in full, within 30 days of the date of this Order. If plaintiff opts to file the application, he shall also file a certified copy of his inmate account statement covering the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of his complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). A “certified copy” is one that has been certified by an authorized prison officer that is a true and correct copy. The Complaint Plaintiff is an inmate at the Fulton Reception and Diagnostic Center in Fulton, Missouri.

(ECF No. 1). He brings this suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Dent County Sheriff Bob Wells in his individual capacity and the Dent County Jail (“Jail”). Id. Plaintiff filed this suit using the Western District of Missouri’s “Prisoner Complaint” form. Id. He attached thereto several handwritten pages. (ECF No. 1-1). Plaintiff’s complaint is defective because it was not drafted on the Eastern District’s Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form. See E.D. Mo. Local Rule 2.06(A) (“All actions brought by self-represented plaintiffs or petitioners should be filed on Court-provided forms where applicable. If an action is not filed on a Court-provided form, the Court, in its discretion, may order the self- represented plaintiff or petitioner to file the action on a Court-provided form.”). The Court will give plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint using the Court’s form. Instructions for Filing Amended Complaint In the “Caption” section of the complaint form, plaintiff must state the first and last name of each defendant, if known. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 10(a) (“The title of the complaint must name all

the parties.”). If there is not enough room in the caption, plaintiff may include additional sheets of paper. Plaintiff must clearly list all defendants and indicate whether he intends to sue each in their individual capacity, official capacity, or both. Plaintiff should avoid naming any defendant that is not directly related to his claim(s). Plaintiff should put his case number in the appropriate location on the upper right-hand section of the first page. In the “Statement of Claim” section, plaintiff should begin by writing a defendant’s name. Then, in separate numbered paragraphs under that name, plaintiff should: (1) set forth a short and plain statement of the factual allegations supporting his claim against that defendant; and (2) state what constitutional or federal statutory right(s) that defendant violated. Each averment must be

simple, concise, and direct. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). If plaintiff is suing more than one defendant, he should proceed in the same manner with each defendant. No introductory or conclusory paragraphs are necessary. Plaintiff should only include claims that arise out of the same transaction or occurrence. Put another way, all of plaintiff’s claims should be related to each other. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 20(a)(2). If, however, plaintiff is suing only a single defendant, he may set forth as many claims as he has against that defendant. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 18(a). Plaintiff’s failure to make specific factual allegations against any defendant will result in that defendant’s dismissal. If plaintiff is suing a defendant in their individual capacity, he is required to allege facts demonstrating that defendant's personal responsibility for harming him. See Madewell v. Roberts, 909 F.2d 1203, 1208 (8th Cir. 1990) (stating that § 1983 liability “requires a causal link to, and direct responsibility for, the deprivation of rights”). If plaintiff is suing multiple defendants, he must establish each defendant’s responsibility for harming him. That is, for each defendant, plaintiff must allege facts showing how that particular defendant’s acts or

omissions violated his constitutional rights. See Topchian v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 760 F.3d 843, 848 (8th Cir. 2014). A conclusory allegation regarding a defendant's supervisory role will not suffice. See Keeper v. King, 130 F.3d 1309, 1314 (8th Cir. 1997) ("[A] general responsibility for supervising the operations of a prison is insufficient to establish the personal involvement required to support liability.") (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff must fill out the Court-provided form completely, including the “Injuries” section. There is no constitutional violation where an inmate cannot show he suffered an injury or adverse health consequence. See Seltzer-Bey v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Denny v. Dent County Jail, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/denny-v-dent-county-jail-moed-2024.