Dennis v. United States

534 U.S. 1156, 151 L. Ed. 2d 1021, 122 S. Ct. 1130, 2002 WL 233847
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 19, 2002
DocketNo. 00-1830; No. 00-1835; No. 00-1944; No. 00-8073; No. 00-8635; No. 00-8719; No. 00-9165; No. 00-9784; No. 00-9885; No. 00-9960; No. 00-10095; No. 00-10178; No. 00-10346; No. 00-10349; No. 00-10361; No. 00-10390; No. 00-10406; No. 00-10419; No. 00-10501; No. 00-10520; No. 00-10525; No. 00-10541; No. 00-10591; No. 00-10693; No. 00-10715; No. 00-10727; No. 00-10778; No. 00-10790; No. 00-10820; No. 01-40; No. 01-62; No. 01-124; No. 01-137; No. 01-429; No. 01-431; No. 01-466; No. 01-472; No. 01-522; No. 01-579; No. 01-587; No. 01-604; No. 01-703; No. 01-5026; No. 01-5055; No. 01-5089; No. 01-5091; No. 01-5107; No. 01-5227; No. 01-5253; No. 01-5383; No. 01-5459; No. 01-5515; No. 01-5534; No. 01-5549; No. 01-5552; No. 01-5571; No. 01-5611; No. 01-5672; No. 01-5696; No. 01-5737; No. 01-5755; No. 01-5843; No. 01-5864; No. 01-5887; No. 01-5889; No. 01-5939; No. 01-5949; No. 01-6051; No. 01-6111; No. 01-6132; No. 01-6265; No. 01-6328; No. 01-6334; No. 01-6355; No. 01-6486; No. 01-6499; No. 01-6529; No. 01-6551; No. 01-6562; No. 01-6573; No. 01-6585; No. 01-6624; No. 01-6626; No. 01-6684; No. 01-6697; No. 01-6742; No. 01-6786
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 534 U.S. 1156 (Dennis v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Dennis v. United States, 534 U.S. 1156, 151 L. Ed. 2d 1021, 122 S. Ct. 1130, 2002 WL 233847 (2002).

Opinion

[1156]*1156ante, p. 821;

ante, p. 822;

ante, p. 828;

532 U. S. 1023;

ante, p. 829;

ante, p. 833;

ante, p. 836;

[1157]*1157No. 00-9960. No. 00-10095. No. 00-10178. No. 00-10346. No. 00-10349. No. 00-10361. No. 00-10390. No. 00-10406. No. 00-10419. No. 00-10501. No. 00-10520. No. 00-10525. No. 00-10541. No. 00-10591. No. 00-10693. No. 00-10715. No. 00-10727. No. 00-10778. No. 00-10790. No. 00-10820. No. 01-40. No. 01-62. No. 01-124. No. 01-137. No. 01-429. No. 01-431. No. 01-466.

ante, p. 839;

ante, p. 842;

ante, p. 812;

ante, p. 852;

ante, p. 853;

ante, p. 811;

ante, p. 856;

ante, p. 857;

ante, p. 862;

ante, p. 863;

ante, p. 864;

ante, p. 873;

ante, p. 874;

ante, p. 875;

ante, p. 878;

ante, p. 879;

ante, p. 881;

ante, p. 972;

ante, p. 891;

ante, p. 892;

ante, p. 1020;

ante, p. 997;

[1158]*1158No. 01-472. No. 01-522. No. 01-579. No. 01-587. No. 01-604. No. 01-703. No. 01-5026. No. 01-5055. No. 01-5089. No. 01-5091. No. 01-5107. No. 01-5227. No. 01-5253. No. 01-5383. No. 01-5459. No. 01-5515. No. 01-5534. No. 01-5549. No. 01-5552. No. 01-5571. No. 01-5611. No. 01-5672. No. 01-5696. No. 01-5737. No. 01-5755. No. 01-5843. No. 01-5864. No. 01-5887.

ante, p. 1041;

ante, p. 1022;

ante, p. 1079;

ante, p. 1066;

ante, p. 1083;

ante, p. 898;

ante, p. 902;

ante, p. 903;

ante, p. 909;

ante, p. 911;

ante, p. 919;

ante, p. 924;

ante, p. 927;

ante, p. 928;

ante, p. 998;

ante, p. 957;

ante, p. 930;

ante, p. 932;

ante, p. 933;

ante, p. 962;

ante, p. 963;

ante, p. 976;

ante, p. 1057;

[1159]*1159No. 01-5889. No. 01-5939. No. 01-5949. No. 01-6051. No. 01-6111. No. 01-6132. No. 01-6265. No. 01-6328. No. 01-6334. No. 01-6355. No. 01-6486. No. 01-6499. No. 01-6529. No. 01-6551. No. 01-6562. No. 01-6573. No. 01-6585. No. 01-6624. No. 01-6626. No. 01-6684. No. 01-6697. No. 01-6742. No. 01-6786.

ante, p. 1000;

ante, p. 1043;

ante, p. 1001;

ante, p. 1003;

ante, p. 1024;

ante, p. 1027;

ante, p. 1044;

ante, p. 1006;

ante, p. 1029;

ante, p. 1012;

ante, p. 1048;

ante, p. 1013;

ante, p. 1059;

ante, p. 1030;

ante, p. 1061;

ante, p. 1069; and

ante, p. 1035. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Johnson
403 F. Supp. 2d 721 (N.D. Iowa, 2005)
Rose v. State
810 N.E.2d 361 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2004)
Yates v. District of Columbia
224 F. Supp. 2d 68 (District of Columbia, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 U.S. 1156, 151 L. Ed. 2d 1021, 122 S. Ct. 1130, 2002 WL 233847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-v-united-states-scotus-2002.