Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston v. Austin Manufacturing Services I, Inc.
This text of Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston v. Austin Manufacturing Services I, Inc. (Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston v. Austin Manufacturing Services I, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 03-15-00429-CV 6930463 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/15/2015 12:46:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK No. 03-15-00429-CV FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 9/15/2015 12:46:55 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston,
Appellants,
v.
Austin Manufacturing Services, I, Inc.,
Appellee.
On Appeal from No. D-1-GN-09-004416, in the 353rd Judicial District Court, Travis County Honorable Orlinda Naranjo, Presiding
FIRST UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE BRIEF OF APPELLANTS
TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS:
Appellants Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston (the Individual
Guarantors) file this Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File their Brief
of Appellants, and in support states as follows:
1. Appellants’ brief is currently due on September 16, 2015. Appellants
seek a seven-day extension of the deadline, and request that the deadline be
extended to September 23, 2015. This is Appellants’ first request for an extension.
1 2. The extension is sought for two reasons. First the extension has
become necessary given conflicts with other pending and time-sensitive matters
that have arisen during the interim between the filing of the record on appeal and
the due date for the filing of the brief. These include, among other things, the
September 4, 2015 filing of the Brief of Appellant in 08-15-00219-CV, Target
Strike, Inc. v. Strasburger & Price, LLP, in the Eighth District Court of Appeals.
Additionally, other matters with urgent time sensitivity have recently arisen that
cannot be detailed publicly but that have required counsel’s attention. These
include strategy sessions, research, and drafting on matters that will affect the
prosecution and/or defense on behalf of various other clients in other cases.
Finally, the undersigned’s services to the State Bar of Texas Appellate section,
including serving as a substitute speaker at last week’s “Appellate 101” course, and
preparation for and participation in the Appellate Section’s Annual Meeting and its
follow-up Committee meeting (preparing treasurer’s report and proposed budget as
outgoing Section Treasurer, and coordinating transition to new treasurer) all
generated a time conflict.
3. The extension is sought for another reason. In the process of drafting
the Brief of Appellant, it became apparent to the undersigned that copies of
exhibits to the Plaintiff’s Original Petition were inadvertently omitted from the
Clerk’s Record. The undersigned intends to request that the district clerk file a
2 supplemental clerk’s record containing those exhibits so they may be properly
cited in the briefing. A seven-day extension is requested to provide time to
accommodate the clerk’s office in that regard.
4. No previous extensions have been sought and no party will be
prejudiced by this requested extension. Opposing counsel graciously indicated
they do not oppose this motion. An extension of the deadline for filing the Brief of
Appellants will allow for the preparation of an appropriate brief that addresses
substantial issues arising in the course of a multi-day bench trial. This extension is
sought not for the purpose of delay, but rather so that the issues in this case may be
properly briefed.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Appellants thus respectfully request that this Court grant the extension until
September 23, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,
/S/ Michael S. Truesdale Michael S. Truesdale
LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL S. TRUESDALE, PLLC State Bar No. 00791825 801 West Avenue, Suite 201 Austin, TX 78701 512-482-8671 866-847-8719 (fax) mike@truesdalelaw.com Counsel for Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley and Charles Huston
3 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I certify that I conferred with Christopher Kratovil (appellate counsel for Appellee Austin Manufacturing Services I, Inc.) and was informed that he does not oppose the relief requested herein.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On September 15, 2015, the undersigned certifies that he served a copy of this Motion for Extension of Time on the following via e-service, in compliance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 9.5 and 25.1(e):
Brian A. Colao Shane M. Boasberg bcolao@dykema.com shaneb@law-smb.com Christopher Kratovil The Law Offices of Shane M. ckratovil@dykema.com Boasberg, P.C. Dykema Gossett PLLC 2901 Bee Caves Road, 1717 Main Street, Suite 4000 Commissioner’s House, Box E Dallas, Texas 75201 Austin, Texas 78746
Counsel for Appellee Austin Counsel for Assistant Pro, Inc., TQI Manufacturing Services Corporation, and Darryl Cornish
/s/ Michael S. Truesdale Michael S. Truesdale SBN 00791825
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Dennis Draper, Greg Hadley, and Charles Huston v. Austin Manufacturing Services I, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/dennis-draper-greg-hadley-and-charles-huston-v-austin-manufacturing-texapp-2015.