Dennard v. Farmers & Merchants Bank
102 S.E. 356, 149 Ga. 837, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 421
Opinion
1. This case is controlled by the decision in Bradley v. State, 111 Ga. 168 (36 S. E. 630, 50 L. R. A. 691, 78 Am. St. R. 157). Accordingly the judge did not err in declining to grant a jury trial on the issue sought to be made by the plaintiffs in error under the Civil Code, § 4643.
2. The judge was authorized, under the evidence, to find the defendants guilty of contempt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dennard v. Farmers & Merchants Bank, 102 S.E. 356, 149 Ga. 837, 1920 Ga. LEXIS 421 (Ga. 1920).
102 S.E. 356 (Dennard v. Farmers & Merchants Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hortman v. Georgia Board of Dental Examiners
105 S.E.2d 732 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Kinney v. Crow
199 S.E. 198 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1938)
Gaston v. Shunk Plow Co.
130 S.E. 580 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)