Denami v. State, No. 01C01-9507-Cr-00224 (Tenn. Crim. App. At Nashville, July 5

• Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
• Decided: December 1, 2010
• Docket: 02C01-9611-cc-00410
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON OCTOBER SESSION, 1997

TYRONE CLAY, ) ) No. 02C01-9611-cc-00410 Appellant ) ) LAKE COUNTY vs. ) ) Hon. Joe G. Riley, Jr., Judge STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) (Post-Conviction) Appellee )

SEPARATE CONCURRING OPINION

I join with the majority in dismissal of the appellant's petition but for entirely

separate reasons. This appeal and a second appeal, No. 02C01-9608-CC-00261,

arise from a single ruling of the trial court in granting the appellant a delayed appeal

based upon ineffective assistant of counsel.

Thus, the appellant has severed the issues of his delayed appeal and is

concurrently challenging on direct appeal both the sentencing decision of the trial

court and his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel via post-

conviction process.

This court has held that a petition for post-conviction relief may not be

maintained while a direct appeal of the same sentence and conviction is pending.

See Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-202(a) and (c) (1996 Supp.). See also Kindall v.

State, No. 01C01-9605-CR-00178 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, Mar. 13, 1997);

Denami v. State, No. 01C01-9507-CR-00224 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville, July 5,

1996); see Jones v. State, No. 02C01-9103-CR-00038 (Tenn. Crim. App. at

Jackson, Dec. 11, 1991) perm. to appeal denied, (Tenn. Dec. 30, 1991). For the above reason, I would find that the instant petition was filed

prematurely and should have been dismissed accordingly.

____________________________________ DAVID G. HAYES, Judge