Demund v. Meade
108 P. 479, 13 Ariz. 236, 1910 Ariz. LEXIS 88
Opinion
In this cause the appellant has failed to file the printed abstract required by rule 1 of this court (8 Ariz. iv, 71 Pac. vi). The transcript of the reporter’s notes does not serve the purpose of the abstract required by the rule. The purpose of the abstract is to enable each of the justices sitting to have a copy of the record before him, and the requirement of the rule must be complied with. Furthermore, none of the assignments of error is sufficiently alleged.
The appeal is dismissed.
CAMPBELL, J., not sitting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Demund v. Meade, 108 P. 479, 13 Ariz. 236, 1910 Ariz. LEXIS 88 (Ark. 1910).
108 P. 479 (Demund v. Meade) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sanders v. Folsom
451 P.2d 612 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1969)
State v. Airesearch Mfg. Co.
206 P.2d 562 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1949)
Olney v. Bishop
114 P. 559 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1911)