Demetrio v. Stewart Title Insurance

124 A.D.3d 827, 998 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2015 NY Slip Op 00721, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 28, 2015
Docket2014-01408
StatusPublished

This text of 124 A.D.3d 827 (Demetrio v. Stewart Title Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Demetrio v. Stewart Title Insurance, 124 A.D.3d 827, 998 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2015 NY Slip Op 00721, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for breach of a title insurance policy, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Fusco, J.), dated December 19, 2013, which granted that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and denied, in part, its cross motion for leave to amend its answer.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied, in part, the defendant’s cross motion for leave to amend its answer is dismissed as academic; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as reviewed, on the law, and that branch of the plaintiff’s motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability is denied; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.

The underlying facts are described in our decision on the related appeal from an order dated March 26, 2013 (see Demetrio v Stewart Tit. Ins. Co., 124 AD3d 824 [2015] [decided herewith]). In the order appealed from here, the Supreme Court granted that branch of the plaintiffs later motion which was for sum *828 mary judgment on the issue of liability, and denied, in part, the defendant’s cross motion for leave to amend its answer. The defendant appeals.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of the plaintiffs motion which was for summary judgment on the issue of liability (see id.).

In light of the determination on the related appeal (see id.), the appeal from so much of the order dated December 19, 2013, as denied, in part, the defendant’s cross motion for leave to amend its answer has been rendered academic.

Rivera, J.E, Dickerson, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Demetrio v. Stewart Title Insurance
124 A.D.3d 824 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 A.D.3d 827, 998 N.Y.S.2d 915, 2015 NY Slip Op 00721, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demetrio-v-stewart-title-insurance-nyappdiv-2015.