Demarest v. City of Bloomfield Hills
This text of 189 N.W.2d 820 (Demarest v. City of Bloomfield Hills) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DEMAREST
v.
CITY OF BLOOMFIELD HILLS
Michigan Court of Appeals.
Thomas J. Dillon, Jr., for plaintiffs.
Brennan & Bibeau, for defendants.
Before: QUINN, P.J., and FITZGERALD and J.H. GILLIS, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Supplementing our order of December 23, 1970, and on the basis of the March 3, 1971 order of the Supreme Court in the case of House v. City of Bloomfield Hills (1971), 384 Mich 811, we affirm the trial court for the reason that this Court's decision in House v. City of Bloomfield Hills (1969), 18 Mich App 184, is completely dispositive of this case of Demarest. Plaintiffs may recover costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 N.W.2d 820, 33 Mich. App. 282, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/demarest-v-city-of-bloomfield-hills-michctapp-1971.