Delman v. Misk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Delman v. Misk

205 A.D.2d 576, 614 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1994

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 A.D.2d 576 (Delman v. Misk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Delman v. Misk, 205 A.D.2d 576, 614 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover the proceeds of promissory notes, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 23, 1991, as conditioned the vacatur of default judgments entered against him in the amount of $114,057.12, on depositing with the court the sum of $114,057.12 as security.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the provision in the [577]*577order which conditioned the vacatur of the default judgments on the deposit of security with the court was not inconsistent with the oral decision rendered by the court following the traverse hearing (cf., Green v Morris, 156 AD2d 331).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover the proceeds of promissory notes, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Price, J.), dated May 23, 1991, as conditioned the vacatur of default judgments entered against him in the amount of $114,057.12, on depositing with the court the sum of $114,057.12 as security.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the provision in the [577]*577order which conditioned the vacatur of the default judgments on the deposit of security with the court was not inconsistent with the oral decision rendered by the court following the traverse hearing (cf., Green v Morris, 156 AD2d 331).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions and conclude that they are without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Pizzuto, Joy and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 576, 614 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/delman-v-misk-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack