Dellameo v. Great Lakes S. S. Co.

9 F.R.D. 77, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3139
District Court, N.D. Ohio·Decided February 14, 1949·No. Civ. No. 25698·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

JONES, Chief Judge.

That information and hospital records are not readily available is not enough to -support “good cause” under Federal Rules of -Civil Procedure, rule 34, 2-8 U.S.C.A. By the -exercise -of any reasonable amount of diligence and -energy the plaintiff has every opportunity of securing the information that he seeks from the papers possessed by the defendant. The names of all witnesses canvassed by the defendant were -made available; the hospital -records really were primarily under -control of the plaintiff and still can be had by him.

There is no showing here that the plaintiff is -entitled to ifavorable action on his motion for production. Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, at page 512, 67 S.Ct. 385, 91 L.Ed. 451.

Motion -denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dellameo v. Great Lakes S. S. Co., 9 F.R.D. 77, 1949 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3139 (N.D. Ohio 1949).

9 F.R.D. 77 (Dellameo v. Great Lakes S. S. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reid v. Harper & Bros.
17 F.R.D. 281 (S.D. New York, 1955)
United States v. Certain Parcels of Land
15 F.R.D. 224 (S.D. California, 1953)
De Gaetano v. Frank A. Clendaniel, Inc.
15 F.R.D. 114 (D. Delaware, 1953)
G. & P. Amusement Co. v. Regent Theater Co.
9 F.R.D. 721 (N.D. Ohio, 1949)